Theory and History:
Fourier-transform ion cyclotron resonance mass
spectrometry (FT-ICR-MS or just FT-MS) is often thought of as being the
most complex method of mass analysis and detection. When considered at
first principles though, it is fairly simple to describe - although
this does ignore many of the 3 dimensional ion perturbation effects
which make the technique far more complex. It is not necessary to
discuss those in any detail here. The technique of ICR-MS was first
published in the mid. 1950's [1] where it was demonstrated for
measurement of very small mass differences at very high precision. The
technique remained a largely academic tool until the application of FT
methods [2] by Alan Marshall and Melvin Comisarow in the early 1970's
[3]. It is now one of the
most sensitive methods of ion detection in existence and has almost
unlimited resolution - >10
7 is possible, with most
experiments taking place in the 10
5 to 10
6 range.
In the basic FT-MS instrument, the ions are
generated in the source (as usual) and then pass through a series of
pumping stages at increasingly high vacuum. When the ions enter the
cell (ion trap) pressures are in the range of 10
-10 to 10
-11
mBar with temperatures close to absolute zero. The cell is located
inside a spatial uniform static superconducting high field magnet
(typically 4.7 to 13 Tesla) cooled by liquid helium and liquid
nitrogen. When the ions pass into the magnetic field they are bent into
a circular motion in a plane perpendicular to the field (see Fig. 1) by
the Lorentz Force (see equation 1 below). They are prevented from
precessing out of the cell by the trapping plates at each end (see Fig.
1).
|
 |
- F is the
Lorentz Force observed by the ion when entering the magnetic field
- B is the
magnetic field strength (constant)
- v is the
incident velocity of the ion
- wc
is the induced cyclotron frequency
- m is the mass
of the ion
- z is the
charge on the ion
|
|
The frequency of rotation of the ions is dependent
on their
m/z
ratio (equation 2). At this stage, no signal is observed because the
radius of the motion is very small. Excitation of each individual
m/z is achieved by a swept RF
pulse across the excitation plates of the cell. Each
individual excitation frequency will couple with the ions natural
motion and excite them to a higher orbit where they induce an
alternating current between the detector plates. The frequency of this
current is the same as the cyclotron frequency of the ions and the
intensity is proportional to the number of ions. When the RF goes off
resonance for that particular
m/z
value, the ions drop back down to their natural orbit (relax) and the
next
m/z packet is excited.
Although the RF sweep is made up of a series of stepped frequencies, it
can be considered as all frequencies simultaneously. This results in
the measurement of all the ions in one go producing a complex frequency
vs. time spectrum containing
all the signals - the FID. Deconvolution of this signal by FT methods
results in the deconvoluted frequency
vs.
intensity spectrum which is then converted to the mass
vs. intensity spectrum (the mass
spectrum) by equation 3. It is also usual to correct for mass errors at
this stage by applying a calibration.
Fig. 1: A Schematic of FT-ICR-MS showing the ion trapping, detection
and signal generation.
Due to the ion-trap
nature of FT-MS, it is possible to measure the ions without destroying
them, this enables further experiments to performed on the ions. The
most common of these would be some kind of fragmentation study (MS/MS
or MSn) for structural elucidation experiments, but also
other gas-phase reactions and studies can be performed - e.g. gas-phase
basicity calculations, gas-phase kinetics, ion dissociation studies as
well as the study of ion-molecule or ion-ion interactions.
Alan Marshall has a published a number of reviews of
FT-ICR and its applications over the years [4]. There is also plenty of
information generally available on the internet.
References:
[1]
J.A. Hipple et al.;
Physical Review, 76;
1949, p1877 and
Physical Review; 82;
1951, p697.
[2] J.W. Cooley and J.W. Tukey;
Mathematics of Computation, 19;
1965, p297.
[3] M.B. Comisarow and A.G. Marshall;
Chemical Physics Letters, 25;
1974, p282 and
Journal of Chemical Physics, 62;
1975, p293 and
Journal of Chemical Physics, 64;
1976, p110
.
[4] A.G. Marshall
Accounts
of Chemical Research, 18;
1985,
p316 and
Accounts of Chemical
Research, 29;
1996,
p308.
©2004 Paul
Gates, University of Bristol
Last updated January 23rd 2004